Want to Know What Facebook Really Thinks of Journalists? Here’s What Happened When It Hired Some. ‘I hear them calling for blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, for reducing trade, and in some cases, even for cutting access to the internet.’” New York Post: Breitbart: Fox News: The Atlantic: The Guardian: The Hill: “‘I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as “others,”’ Zuckerberg said, never referring to Trump by name. But apparently some of the employees at Facebook’s notoriously white, bro-centric Menlo Park, California office don’t agree.” NBC News: USA Today: National Public Radio: Newsweek:įacebook Employees Asked Mark Zuckerberg If They Should Try to Stop a Donald Trump Presidency Image: AP “This week, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared to publicly denounce the political positions of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign during the keynote speech of the company’s annual F8 developer conference. Mark Zuckerberg Asks Racist Facebook Employees to Stop Crossing Out Black Lives Matter Slogans “The Black Lives Matter movement has shed light on the racial profiling, police brutality, and racial inequality experienced by the African-American community across America. This is what Peter Thiel is trying to destroy. There are countless other posts that could join them. Anyone moved to dismiss the million-plus stories that we have published over the years as nothing more than “gutter journalism” ought to account for the by-no-means-comprehensive sampling of posts below, which we have arranged along with examples of the contemporaneous reaction to, praise for, and impact of the work. If our lengthy published record of news, essays, investigations, satire, and criticism is “not journalism,” as the refrain goes, then why has so much of it been cited, amplified, and followed by our more respectable establishment peers? If we aim for nothing but cruelty, or nothing but clicks, why have our writers drawn so many of the finest (or most well-remunerated) writers in the rest of the business to engage with our work? And we can’t help but conclude it is at odds with a lot of other people’s experience. We have earned a long list of enemies.īut the notion that Gawker Media-the company, encompassing seven web sites, that Thiel is attempting to permanently silence-is best understood as a platform for spewing hatred, or for bullying, is at odds with our own experience. Gawker Media has not put a lot of effort, over the years, into being likable. Even those who are rightly alarmed at Thiel’s unprecedented attack on an institution that he regards as “terrible for the Valley” usually feel the need to preface that conclusion with some form of “I hate to defend Gawker, but.” The discussion begins, in most cases, with the premise that Gawker is bad. It was dispiriting, and less surprising, to hear the conversation that followed the revelation. It was surprising to hear the news last week that right-wing billionaire investor Peter Thiel has been secretly trying to destroy Gawker Media through proxy lawsuits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |